Aquarium Forum
Advertise
General Freshwater Forum This is the general freshwater aquarium forum. Also a place for freshwater filtration and freshwater chemistry posts.

Go Back   Aquarium Forum General Freshwater Aquarium Topics General Freshwater Forum

Forgot Password?
Connect with Facebook

Welcome to the Aquarium Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Connect with Facebook
OR

Members currently in the chatroom: 0
The most chatters online in one day was 16, 03-02-2012.
No one is currently using the chat.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2011, 02:11 AM   #1 (permalink)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 8
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Thanks" 0 Times
Was Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default "Advanced" filtration question:

Hi there, I'm new to your forum, had a specific question about filtration, but not the basic cycling stuff. To help with more info, you can assume I understand cycling a tank, have kept 3 healthy tanks for 5 years.

My question is about what I call the 'good' bacteria, that builds up in filtration systems, helps keeps the poo tolerable.

Q: Is there a difference in the 'good bacteria' that builds up in 'wet-dry' filtration vs. the "good bacteria" that build up in an underwater/undergravel filter, with only 'wet' filtration?


I ask because I recently started an very small, mostly decorative, 8g tank. It's one of those 'picture tanks', 30' long, but only 4' wide. It will only contain a few 1-2" max fish.

The smallest hang-on-the side filter is a real tight fit, I see easy spillage, so I went with a little fluval underwater filter, it's basically a power head with a cover on the sponge. I'm curious how important the 'dry' part actually is, since the big canisters don't turn over oxygen either.

If you made it that far, and if that makes any sense, thanks for any thoughts.
clownmob is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To clownmob

Join AquariumForum.com Today - It's Free!

Are you an aquarium enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

AquariumForum.com is owned and operated by fellow lifelong aquarium enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join AquariumForum.com Today! - Click Here


Sponsors

Old 07-07-2011, 10:59 AM   #2 (permalink)
This is how I feel.
Scuff's Avatar
Welcome Wagon
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 753
Name: Mar
Location: Sunapee, New Hampshire
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Welcome to Aquarium Forum" 114 Times
Said "Thanks" 42 Times
Was Thanked 253 Times in 184 Posts
Default Re: "Advanced" filtration question:

They're all nitrosomonas bacteria, and thus the same. 'Wet' and 'Dry' just refer to the biological filtration application of those bacteria. The 'dry' filters are not submersed in water constantly, but instead are covered with a thin film of water that creates an oxygen-rich environment (think a filter spool of a Penguin filter), whereas 'wet' just means it's submersed (your gravel, for instance). Ultimately in a freshwater tank there isn't much reason to worry about the differences between the two, so long as you're getting the filtration you need.
__________________

The Rules: Read them, learn them, lick them, love them.

Last edited by Scuff : 07-10-2011 at 08:26 PM.
Scuff is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To Scuff
Old 07-07-2011, 11:59 AM   #3 (permalink)
Welcome Wagon
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,325
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Welcome to Aquarium Forum" 339 Times
Said "Thanks" 32 Times
Was Thanked 835 Times in 761 Posts
Default Re: "Advanced" filtration question:

+1

plus plant action helps as well by consuming ammonia even if no bacteria is present.
__________________
fw leiden since 1979, fo salt since 1979, mixed reef 55g 2002-2009. Strong emphasis on the tank taking care of itself. Balanced with plant life, no water changes, tap water, no filters in FW. Only dosing calcium, alk, mag in marine reef tanks. http://www.aquariumforum.com/f15/my-...ods-26410.html
recent tanks (till 2009) 7 years- 10g FW leiden 7 yrs, 55g mixed reef 7, 2 yrs, 20g FW leiden, 10 g fw leiden , 29g mixed reef, current tank 55g leiden
beaslbob is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To beaslbob
Old 07-07-2011, 12:46 PM   #4 (permalink)
What do fish think about?
Gizmo's Avatar
Welcome Wagon
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,350
Name: Guy Miller
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Feedback: 7 / 100%
Said "Welcome to Aquarium Forum" 183 Times
Said "Thanks" 451 Times
Was Thanked 603 Times in 573 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Gizmo
Default Re: "Advanced" filtration question:

@Scuff - +1, but aren't some nitrospira (sp?) bacteria as well?

I would say the only time you'd want a sump is if you're interested in a refugium and have a BIG tank. Also, the only time you WOULDN'T want an undergravel filter, in my opinion, is when you're using a sand substrate or are growing live plants.
__________________
Officially fishless until after the move....tune in later for details!
Gizmo is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To Gizmo
Old 07-07-2011, 12:53 PM   #5 (permalink)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 8
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Thanks" 0 Times
Was Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: "Advanced" filtration question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scuff View Post
They're all nitrosomonas bacteria, and thus the same. 'Wet' and 'Dry' just refer to the biological filtration application of those bacteria. The 'dry' filters are submersed in water constantly (think a filter spool of a Penguin filter), whereas 'wet' just means it's submersed (your gravel, for instance). Ultimately in a freshwater tank there isn't much reason to worry about the differences between the two, so long as you're getting the filtration you need.
I don't follow that a 'dry' filter is constantly subermerged, I always assumed a bio-wheel comes out of the water specifically to get some oxygen interaction for the bacteria.

You're saying there is no particluar advantage to the interaction with open air, as long as you turn over enough water. I thought the oxygen transfer helped, or made the bacteria more effective as opposed to always underwater.

It's not a biggie, something always been curious about, curious any opinions.
clownmob is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To clownmob
Sponsors

Old 07-09-2011, 01:52 PM   #6 (permalink)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 8
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Thanks" 0 Times
Was Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: "Advanced" filtration question:

Does anyone know if oxygenated bacteria are different than underwater bacteria? More effective, less effective, the same?
clownmob is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To clownmob
Old 07-10-2011, 08:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Welcome Wagon
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,325
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Welcome to Aquarium Forum" 339 Times
Said "Thanks" 32 Times
Was Thanked 835 Times in 761 Posts
Default Re: "Advanced" filtration question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by clownmob View Post
Does anyone know if oxygenated bacteria are different than underwater bacteria? More effective, less effective, the same?

Underwater there is aerobic bacteria which is baceria that thrive in an oxygen environment where the water has lotsa oxygen. the aerobic bacteria are the nitrogen cycle ammonia->nitrite->nitrate.

the is also anaerobic bacteria which grow in a low oxygen environment. (Such as the substrate). those convert nitrates to nitrite then to nitgoren gas.

there are additional bacterio which can create ammonia (from the nitrates) and various sulfer compounds. Obviouly these bacteria and the by products are not desirable. and responsible for the bad smell and environment of septic tanks and the like.

But in out tanks I personally thing the best is aerobic bacteria with live plants to consume the resulting nitrates and oxygenate the water.


my .02
__________________
fw leiden since 1979, fo salt since 1979, mixed reef 55g 2002-2009. Strong emphasis on the tank taking care of itself. Balanced with plant life, no water changes, tap water, no filters in FW. Only dosing calcium, alk, mag in marine reef tanks. http://www.aquariumforum.com/f15/my-...ods-26410.html
recent tanks (till 2009) 7 years- 10g FW leiden 7 yrs, 55g mixed reef 7, 2 yrs, 20g FW leiden, 10 g fw leiden , 29g mixed reef, current tank 55g leiden
beaslbob is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To beaslbob
Old 07-10-2011, 08:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
This is how I feel.
Scuff's Avatar
Welcome Wagon
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 753
Name: Mar
Location: Sunapee, New Hampshire
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Welcome to Aquarium Forum" 114 Times
Said "Thanks" 42 Times
Was Thanked 253 Times in 184 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clownmob View Post
Does anyone know if oxygenated bacteria are different than underwater bacteria? More effective, less effective, the same?
Sorry, I wrote my post wrong. I meant that it's not constantly submersed in water, but instead it's covered in a thin film of water that creates a high-oxygen environment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtm2007@yahoo.com View Post
@Scuff - +1, but aren't some nitrospira (sp?) bacteria as well?
Nitrosomonas bacteria take care of the ammonia, while nitrobacter take care of the nitrites.
__________________

The Rules: Read them, learn them, lick them, love them.
Scuff is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To Scuff
Old 07-10-2011, 08:29 PM   #9 (permalink)
Welcome Wagon
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,325
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Welcome to Aquarium Forum" 339 Times
Said "Thanks" 32 Times
Was Thanked 835 Times in 761 Posts
Default Re: "Advanced" filtration question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scuff View Post
Sorry, I wrote my post wrong. I meant that it's not constantly submersed in water, but instead it's covered in a thin film of water that creates a high-oxygen environment.


Nitrosomonas bacteria take care of the ammonia, while nitrobacter take care of the nitrites.
I think it's the same bacteria either way.
__________________
fw leiden since 1979, fo salt since 1979, mixed reef 55g 2002-2009. Strong emphasis on the tank taking care of itself. Balanced with plant life, no water changes, tap water, no filters in FW. Only dosing calcium, alk, mag in marine reef tanks. http://www.aquariumforum.com/f15/my-...ods-26410.html
recent tanks (till 2009) 7 years- 10g FW leiden 7 yrs, 55g mixed reef 7, 2 yrs, 20g FW leiden, 10 g fw leiden , 29g mixed reef, current tank 55g leiden
beaslbob is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To beaslbob
Old 07-10-2011, 08:33 PM   #10 (permalink)
This is how I feel.
Scuff's Avatar
Welcome Wagon
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 753
Name: Mar
Location: Sunapee, New Hampshire
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Welcome to Aquarium Forum" 114 Times
Said "Thanks" 42 Times
Was Thanked 253 Times in 184 Posts
Default Re: "Advanced" filtration question:

I'm reasonably sure that nitrosomonas and nitrobacter are different bacteria, but ultimately it doesn't matter as long as the water is kept clean.
__________________

The Rules: Read them, learn them, lick them, love them.
Scuff is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To Scuff
Said thanks:
Old 07-11-2011, 09:38 AM   #11 (permalink)
Welcome Wagon
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,325
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Welcome to Aquarium Forum" 339 Times
Said "Thanks" 32 Times
Was Thanked 835 Times in 761 Posts
Default Re: "Advanced" filtration question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by beaslbob View Post
I think it's the same bacteria either way.
Woppsies

Sure the bacteria for the ammonia and the bacteria for the nitrIte are different.

What I meant is the either bacteria are aquatic and it doesn't make any difference if the water travels through a wet dry. What is important is the water is oxygenated. For instance, in my case I do that with live plants and no circulation yet thing thrive for years.

Still just .02
__________________
fw leiden since 1979, fo salt since 1979, mixed reef 55g 2002-2009. Strong emphasis on the tank taking care of itself. Balanced with plant life, no water changes, tap water, no filters in FW. Only dosing calcium, alk, mag in marine reef tanks. http://www.aquariumforum.com/f15/my-...ods-26410.html
recent tanks (till 2009) 7 years- 10g FW leiden 7 yrs, 55g mixed reef 7, 2 yrs, 20g FW leiden, 10 g fw leiden , 29g mixed reef, current tank 55g leiden
beaslbob is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To beaslbob
Old 07-11-2011, 03:58 PM   #12 (permalink)
This is how I feel.
Scuff's Avatar
Welcome Wagon
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 753
Name: Mar
Location: Sunapee, New Hampshire
Feedback: 0 / 0%
Said "Welcome to Aquarium Forum" 114 Times
Said "Thanks" 42 Times
Was Thanked 253 Times in 184 Posts
Default Re: "Advanced" filtration question:

Well put, Beaslbob. Wet or dry, the application doesn't really matter.
__________________

The Rules: Read them, learn them, lick them, love them.
Scuff is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To Scuff
Reply

Previous Thread: Nitrites in DP tank
Next Thread: plec


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 PM.





Fish Topsites
Follow us on Twitter!
Alltop, confirmation that we kick ass

All content Copyright © AquariumForum.com & the respective author. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer: We are not responsible for the content of any post or thread. This is a public forum and the content posted does not reflect the opinions of nor are endorsed by AquariumForum.com nor any of our employees.